A Critique of Hans George Gadamer’s Philosophical Hemerneutics

Abstract

Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics represents one of the most influential contributions to contemporary philosophy, emphasizing the universality of interpretation and the fusion of horizons in understanding. However, this framework has not been without its critiques, particularly regarding its epistemological, methodological, and ethical implications. This paper offers a critical examination of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, focusing on its core concepts, such as the fusion of horizon which underscores the dialogical nature of understanding. Data is sourced from both primary and secondary sources. Using an evaluative method of philosophical research, the paper interrogates whether Gadamer’s approach adequately addresses power dynamics, cultural asymmetries, and the subjectivity inherent in interpretation. Furthermore, the paper assesses Gadamer’s resistance to methodological rigidity in light of critiques from critical theorists and post-structuralists who argue for a more systematic and politically engaged hermeneutics. By situating Gadamer’s philosophy within broader debates on interpretation, the paper concludes that while Gadamer’s silence on the power dynamics that is at play in the unfolding of history and its interpretation leads to problems in contemporary discuss of hermeneutics, his philosophical hermeneutics provides an ethical imperative to seek social equality and struggle against marginalization.