THE FEMINIST DECONSTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND THE RISE OF A BIBLICAL COUNTER-PARADIGM

Authors

  • Mariam Samo Adventist University of Africa, Nairobi, Kenya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19321336

Keywords:

Feminism, Family, Complementarianism, Patriarchy, Gender Roles, Social History

Abstract

This paper examines the feminist intellectual and political project as a principal catalyst for the 
systematic re-examination and transformation of the patriarchal family in Western society. 
Through a historical analysis structured around the evolving "waves" of feminism, it traces how 
feminist theory has reconceptualized the family from a presumed natural, divine institution to a 
social construct underpinned by power relations. The analysis demonstrates how successive 
feminist movements - from first-wave assaults on coverture to fourth-wave digital activism - have 
critically engaged with the legal, economic, and ideological foundations of the heteronormative 
nuclear family, facilitating a significant diversification of family forms and a redefinition of 
kinship. In response to this century-long critique, a significant counter-paradigm emerged in the 
late twentieth century: evangelical complementarianism. This modern theological framework, 
explicitly formulated as a defense of perceived created gender distinctions against feminist 
thought, positions itself as the biblical model for family structure. This paper argues that the 
contemporary landscape of family and gender relations is fundamentally shaped by the dialectical 
tension between these co-constituted paradigms - one seeking liberation through social 
reimagination, the other seeking order through the affirmation of a theological vision of created 
complementarity. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026

How to Cite

THE FEMINIST DECONSTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND THE RISE OF A BIBLICAL COUNTER-PARADIGM. (2026). BU Insight: Journal of Religious Studies, 19(1), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19321336